Something went wrong
Try again later.
V/H/S: Viral
During a violent chase of the police in Los Angeles Street, that attract the attention of all citizens, including those teenagers that seek only fame to go out in streets with their phones, in order to photo the moment, but incidents come to challenge them, as they become the next victims.
23 May 1975, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
30 July 1964, Abington, Pennsylvania, USA
22 December 1979, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, USA
6 July 1982, Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
November 12, 1985 in Schuyler, Nebraska, USA
4 July 1980, Los Angeles, California, USA
February 21, 2015
After much white noise and other loud sounds along with annoying picture fluctuations, the individual horror segments begin. None of them are impressive.November 24, 2014
I credit it for really engaging with our culture's omnipresent voyeurism instead of just using it as an excuse to cut the budget.November 25, 2014
Though hardcore fans of the series will no doubt walk away at least somewhat satisfied by Viral's offerings, it definitely skimps out on horror in favor of more playful and loose genre riffing.October 16, 2015
As a collective, there's great, good and average to be had here. It's always a risk run with these anthologies, but the audience is there for them and Viral is a good addition to the series.January 09, 2015
VHS: Viral fractures its format with gluttonous camera work, excessive CGI, and pandering sentiments that are more preachy than legitimately frightening.November 18, 2014
[Its] pleasures barely compensate for the vapidity of V/H/S: Viral's sketches.August 23, 2015
Not nearly as consistent as its predecessors, but at least two of the segments are quite solid.November 28, 2014
I couldn't wait to hit eject on this whole jittery mess.October 17, 2014
Three playful yet thoroughly disposable experiments in short-form p.o.v. cinema.August 23, 2016
Like any franchise, a third outing is difficult to pull off yet, and such is the case here, with few ample rewards to be found.November 20, 2014
A sequel so slapdash and ineffectual that its army of directors-six of them total, counting the poor sucker whose contribution got axed-might well be accused of intentionally burying the franchise.November 21, 2014
A film that contains some of the sloppiest, most ineffective filmmaking I've seen all year.